22/05/2015-20:27:22
RE: Une platine Mélaudia ?
j'avoue que j'ai pas le courage de tout lire ( les plus courtes sont les meilleures 
)...
mais vers la moitié environ...
In fact, I am convinced that if any turntable manufacturer, 30 years ago, had built idler-drives as seriously as Goldmund built direct-drives, or as Micro-Seiki built belt-drives, we would still have idler-drive turntables being made today. Instead, we have the comedy/tragedy of a relatively mediocre turntable, the Linn Sondek, surviving all these decades, while ironically claiming a special performance capability in those exact areas, such as "PRaT", in which any good idler-drive is so far superior to it that the "comparison" is actually grotesque.
peut être plus que le principe de fonctionnement, il y a aussi la commercialisation du produit, la volonté du constructeur...
par contre pour un fana du galet, il ne dit pas un mot sur la platine epson seiko?
http://audio-heritage.jp/SEIKO_EPSON/pla...a2000.html
)...mais vers la moitié environ...
In fact, I am convinced that if any turntable manufacturer, 30 years ago, had built idler-drives as seriously as Goldmund built direct-drives, or as Micro-Seiki built belt-drives, we would still have idler-drive turntables being made today. Instead, we have the comedy/tragedy of a relatively mediocre turntable, the Linn Sondek, surviving all these decades, while ironically claiming a special performance capability in those exact areas, such as "PRaT", in which any good idler-drive is so far superior to it that the "comparison" is actually grotesque.
peut être plus que le principe de fonctionnement, il y a aussi la commercialisation du produit, la volonté du constructeur...
par contre pour un fana du galet, il ne dit pas un mot sur la platine epson seiko?
http://audio-heritage.jp/SEIKO_EPSON/pla...a2000.html